Based on what you told us about your organisation.
Starting from scratch
Most of the basic governance instruments either don't exist or can't be found. That's more common than you'd think in organisations your size, and it's fixable in a sensible order rather than all at once.
Patchy foundations
Some things are in place and others aren't, which usually means the gaps only surface under pressure. The priority is closing the structural holes before adding anything new.
Working, with gaps
The core is there and mostly functioning. What's left is the difference between governance that satisfies an auditor and governance that actually helps you run the place.
Solid, refining
You're ahead of most organisations your size. The remaining work is depth and consistency rather than construction.
These are the areas you scored lowest on.
Committees without current terms of reference either duplicate the board's work or quietly leave gaps nobody owns.
A policy set nobody trusts gets ignored, and an ignored policy is worse than no policy when something goes wrong.
Unclear decision rights slow everything down and put the board in the position of either rubber-stamping or second-guessing.
A register that only moves before board meetings is a compliance artefact, not a management tool.
If you can't see what exists, you can't tell what's missing, and neither can your board or your auditor.
Inconsistent papers make directors work harder than they should to find the decision they're being asked to make.
Without a stated standard, promotion becomes guesswork and succession planning has nothing to plan against.
Finding out an obligation exists because you've missed it is the most expensive way to learn.
Share your email address and we’ll get in touch to explore how we can help you.
The Groundwork Check is a self-assessment tool, not an audit, and it is not legal or professional advice. Results reflect what you told us about your organisation.